You are here

FAU Collections » FAU Research Repository » FAU Theses and Dissertations

influrence of language on recognition memory for motion

Download pdf | Full Screen View

Date Issued:
2013
Summary:
Satellite-framed languages and verb-framed languages differ in how they encode motion events. English encodes or lexicalizes Path in verb particles, prepositional phrases, or satellites associated with the main verb. In contrast, Turkish tends to encode Path in the main verb of a clause. When describing motion events, English speakers typically use verbs that convey information about manner rather than path, whereas Turkish speakers do the opposite. In this study, we investigated whether this crosslinguistic difference between English and Turkish influences how the speakers of these languages perform in a non-linguistic recognition memory task. In a video description task, English speakers used more manner verbs in the main verb of sentences than Turkish speakers did. In the recognition memory task, English speakers attended more strongly than Turkish speakers did to path of motion. English and Turkish speakers attended equally to manner of motion, however, providing no support for the linguistic relativity hypothesis.
Title: The influrence of language on recognition memory for motion.
111 views
31 downloads
Name(s): Karaman, Ferhat.
Charles E. Schmidt College of Science
Department of Psychology
Type of Resource: text
Genre: Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation
Date Issued: 2013
Publisher: Florida Atlantic University
Physical Form: electronic
Extent: ix, 70 p. : ill. (some col.)
Language(s): English
Summary: Satellite-framed languages and verb-framed languages differ in how they encode motion events. English encodes or lexicalizes Path in verb particles, prepositional phrases, or satellites associated with the main verb. In contrast, Turkish tends to encode Path in the main verb of a clause. When describing motion events, English speakers typically use verbs that convey information about manner rather than path, whereas Turkish speakers do the opposite. In this study, we investigated whether this crosslinguistic difference between English and Turkish influences how the speakers of these languages perform in a non-linguistic recognition memory task. In a video description task, English speakers used more manner verbs in the main verb of sentences than Turkish speakers did. In the recognition memory task, English speakers attended more strongly than Turkish speakers did to path of motion. English and Turkish speakers attended equally to manner of motion, however, providing no support for the linguistic relativity hypothesis.
Identifier: 860991025 (oclc), 3362478 (digitool), FADT3362478 (IID), fau:4191 (fedora)
Note(s): by Ferhat Karaman.
Thesis (M.A.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2013.
Includes bibliography.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
System requirements: Adobe Reader.
Subject(s): Psycholinguistics
Computational neuroscience
Cognitive psychology
Context effects (Psychology)
Transference (Psychology)
Motion segmentation
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/fcla/dt/3362478
Use and Reproduction: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
Host Institution: FAU